DAILY NEWS / TRENDING NEWS

 On October 10, 2025, a magnitude 7.6 earthquake struck offshore near Manay, Davao Oriental, in the southern Philippines. The quake occurred at 9:43 a.m. local time, with a depth of 10 kilometers, according to the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (Phivolcs). The tremor was felt across Mindanao, causing panic, structural damage, and triggering tsunami warnings in multiple provinces.

Philippines, Earthquake Jolts Mindanao Sparks Tsunami Alerts

Phivolcs issued tsunami alerts for coastal areas including:

• Davao Oriental

• Surigao del Sur

• Dinagat Islands

• Eastern Samar

• Southern Leyte

Residents were urged to evacuate to higher ground immediately. The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center warned of waves between 1 to 3 meters above normal tide levels, while Indonesia also issued alerts for North Sulawesi and Papua.

Damage and Casualties

• One person died after being hit by falling debris in Davao Oriental

• Power outages affected multiple towns

• Cracks reported in buildings, including schools and airports

• Over 50 students were hospitalized due to injuries and shock

• Classes and work suspended in Mati City and surrounding areas

Local officials confirmed aftershocks continued throughout the day, deepening fears and disrupting emergency response efforts.

The Philippines lies on the Pacific Ring of Fire, a region known for intense seismic activity. This quake was caused by movement along the Philippine Trench, where the Philippine Sea Plate subducts beneath the Eurasian Plate. The region experiences over 800 earthquakes annually, but this was one of the strongest in recent years.

Experts emphasize the importance of:

• Early warning systems

• Community drills and education

• Structural resilience in coastal towns

The quake came just two weeks after a deadly 6.9 magnitude quake in Cebu, which killed 72 people.

 On the evening of October 6, 2025, a tragic event unfolded at Disneyland Resort in Anaheim, California, when a female visitor in her 60s was found unresponsive after riding the Haunted Mansion. Emergency responders were called to the scene around 6:30 p.m., and Disneyland security personnel administered CPR until paramedics arrived. The woman was transported to a nearby hospital, where she was later pronounced dead.

About the Haunted Mansion Ride

The Haunted Mansion, which opened in 1969, is one of Disneyland’s most iconic attractions. It features:

• A slow-moving “doom buggy” ride through a haunted estate

• Special effects and characters from Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas during seasonal overlays

• A reputation for being family-friendly, with minimal physical intensity

At the time of the incident, the ride was operating under its Haunted Mansion Holiday theme, combining Halloween and Christmas elements.

Cause of Death and Investigation

According to the Anaheim Police Department, there was no indication of any malfunction or operational issue with the ride. The incident is being treated as an unfortunate medical episode, possibly a heart attack, though the official cause of death will be determined by the Orange County Sheriff-Coroner’s Office.

Officials have not released the woman’s name or city of residence, citing respect for the family’s privacy.

Expert Commentary on Theme Park Safety

Theme park consultant Dennis Speigel noted that deaths at major parks like Disneyland are extremely rare, especially on low-intensity rides like the Haunted Mansion. He emphasized:

• Disney’s rigorous safety inspections (daily, weekly, monthly)

• Oversight by the California Department of Industrial Relations

• Comparisons showing it’s safer to ride Disneyland attractions than drive on a freeway

This incident follows another fatality at Universal Orlando’s Epic Universe, where a man died after riding the Stardust Racers roller coaster in September 2025. While both cases are unrelated, they have prompted renewed scrutiny of theme park emergency protocols and guest health awareness.

 Hurricane Priscilla, a powerful Pacific storm, formed in early October 2025 and impacted Mexico’s southwestern coast before sending moisture into the U.S. Southwest. Initially a tropical storm, Priscilla intensified into a Category 2 hurricane with winds peaking at 110 mph, before weakening midweek.

Path and Progression

The storm’s center remained offshore but followed a northwestward path, skimming the coastlines of Jalisco, Colima, and Baja California Sur. Tropical storm watches were issued for regions from Punta San Telmo to Punta Mita, with warnings of high surf and flooding3.

Rainfall Totals and Risk Zones

Heavy rainfall drenched parts of Mexico:

• Up to 8 inches in mountainous zones

• Flash flood risks in Michoacán, Guerrero, and Colima

• Rip currents and coastal erosion along Pacific beaches

U.S. Impact: Arizona and Beyond

Moisture from Priscilla reached Arizona, California, and Nevada, bringing:

• Rain chances of 40–70% in Phoenix and Globe

• Localized flooding alerts in flood-prone areas

• Cooler temperatures and increased humidity across the region

Though Hurricane Priscilla weakened by October 9, its lasting effects included flash flood threats, coastal hazards, and tropical moisture surges. The storm served as a reminder of how Pacific hurricanes can influence weather far beyond their origin, especially in vulnerable regions of the southwestern United States.

 On June 20, 2025, a devastating tornado tore through Enderlin, North Dakota, leaving behind a trail of destruction and claiming three lives. Initially rated as an EF3, the storm has now been officially upgraded to an EF5, the highest classification on the Enhanced Fujita Scale. This marks the first EF5 tornado in the United States since 2013, ending a 12-year drought of the most extreme tornado category.

An EF5 tornado is defined by wind speeds exceeding 200 miles per hour (322 km/h). These storms are capable of:

• Sweeping away well-built homes

• Uprooting and debarking trees

• Tossing vehicles and even train cars hundreds of feet

• Causing catastrophic damage over wide areas

The Enderlin tornado met these criteria after extensive analysis by the National Weather Service (NWS), which found evidence of train cars being lofted nearly 500 feet and grain hoppers tipped over, confirming wind speeds above 210 mph.

Path and Impact

• Location: Enderlin, North Dakota (60 miles southwest of Fargo)

• Date: June 20, 2025

• Fatalities: 3 confirmed deaths

• Path length: Over 12 miles

• Width: More than 1 mile at peak

• Damage: Farmsteads swept off foundations, trees stripped and snapped, rail cars derailed3

The tornado was part of a larger derecho system that brought widespread wind damage across North Dakota and into Minnesota.

Why the Upgrade Took Months

Although the tornado struck in June, the EF5 rating was only confirmed in October 2025. The delay occurred because:

• Damage surveys require forensic analysis

• Engineers and meteorologists reviewed structural failures

• Wind speed estimates were based on physical damage indicators like train car displacement

Without these indicators, the tornado might have remained classified as EF3 or EF4.

The last EF5 tornado in the U.S. occurred in Moore, Oklahoma, on May 20, 2013, killing 24 people. Since then, no tornado had met the criteria for EF5—until Enderlin. This makes the June 2025 event historically significant for meteorologists and disaster researchers.

The North Dakota EF5 tornado is a stark reminder of nature’s power and unpredictability. As climate patterns shift and extreme weather events become more frequent, accurate classification and rapid response remain critical. For Enderlin and the surrounding communities, the scars of June 20 will not be forgotten—but the lessons learned may help save lives in the future.

 The sports world was stunned by the sudden death of Arthur Jones, a former NFL defensive lineman and Super Bowl champion, who passed away on October 3, 2025, at the age of 39. Known for his powerful presence on the field and his close ties to athletic siblings Jon “Bones” Jones and Chandler Jones, Arthur’s untimely passing has sparked widespread mourning and curiosity about the cause of death.

Arthur Jones Cause of Death

 What Caused Arthur Jones’ Death?

According to reports from NewsChannel 9 Syracuse and Onondaga County officials, Arthur Jones died from a heart-related issue. He had a pre-existing heart condition and was fitted with a pacemaker, which triggered a medical alert on the morning of his death. Emergency services responded to his home in Pompey, New York, just before 11 a.m., but Jones had already passed away.

• Date of death: October 3, 2025

• Age: 39

• Cause: Heart-related condition; pacemaker activation

• Location: Pompey, New York

There were no signs of foul play, and the death was described as sudden but medically explainable.

Arthur Jones’ NFL Legacy

Jones played seven seasons in the NFL, appearing in 64 games and recording 10 sacks, not including his pivotal sack in Super Bowl XLVII, where the Baltimore Ravens defeated the San Francisco 49ers. He also played for the Indianapolis Colts and Washington Commanders before retiring in 2017.

• Drafted: 2010 by the Baltimore Ravens

• Super Bowl Champion: 2013

• Retired: 2017

Arthur was the eldest brother of UFC legend Jon Jones and NFL star Chandler Jones. He was known for his loyalty, leadership, and love for family. His wife, Camille, and their two sons were frequently mentioned in tributes from teammates and coaches.

Coach John Harbaugh of the Ravens praised Jones as “a dedicated teammate, a relentless worker, and someone any coach would be proud to lead.”

Jones’ heart condition had been managed with a defibrillator and pacemaker, which automatically alerted his doctor when triggered. Unfortunately, despite the alert, EMS arrived too late to save him. The incident highlights the importance of early detection and rapid response in cardiac emergencies.

Tributes poured in from across the NFL and MMA communities. Former teammates, fans, and sports figures remembered Jones for his infectious energy, radiant smile, and generous spirit. The Baltimore Ravens shared heartfelt messages on social media, honoring his contributions both on and off the field.

Arthur Jones’ death is a tragic reminder of the hidden health risks athletes may face, even after retirement. His legacy as a Super Bowl champion, family man, and beloved teammate will live on in the hearts of fans and fellow athletes.

 The names Ed Gein and Ted Bundy are etched into the annals of American criminal history. Gein, the inspiration behind fictional characters like Norman Bates and Leatherface, was arrested in 1957. Bundy, one of the most notorious serial killers of the 20th century, was active in the 1970s. Despite their infamy, a persistent myth circulates online: Did Ed Gein help catch Ted Bundy?

The short answer is no—but the origins of this rumor are worth exploring.

 Who Was Ed Gein?

Ed Gein was a reclusive man from Plainfield, Wisconsin, whose crimes shocked the nation in the late 1950s. He was convicted of murdering two women and was found to have exhumed corpses from local cemeteries to create macabre household items. Gein was declared legally insane and spent the rest of his life in a mental institution.

• Arrested: 1957

• Declared insane: 1958

• Died: 1984 in Mendota Mental Health Institute

Who Was Ted Bundy?

Ted Bundy was a charismatic and manipulative serial killer who confessed to murdering over 30 women across multiple states in the 1970s. He was arrested several times, escaped custody twice, and was ultimately executed in 1989.

• Active years: 1974–1978

• Arrested: 1978

• Executed: 1989 in Florida State Prison

Did Their Paths Cross?

There is no historical evidence that Ed Gein and Ted Bundy ever met, communicated, or were involved in each other’s cases. Gein was institutionalized in Wisconsin while Bundy operated in states like Washington, Utah, Colorado, and Florida. Their crimes were separated by decades and geography.

Origins of the Myth

The myth likely stems from:

• Pop culture confusion: Both killers inspired horror films and documentaries.

• Internet speculation: Social media and forums often blur timelines and facts.

• Psychological profiling: Some assume Gein’s case influenced FBI profiling used to catch Bundy, but this is indirect.

While Gein’s case contributed to early criminal psychology studies, it did not directly aid in catching Bundy. Bundy was apprehended through traditional police work, eyewitness accounts, and forensic evidence—not through insights from Gein’s crimes.

The idea that Ed Gein helped catch Ted Bundy is a myth. While both men are infamous in true crime history, their lives and crimes were separate. Understanding their timelines and legal outcomes helps clarify this persistent misconception.

 A major breakthrough may be underway in the search for Amelia Earhart’s missing plane, as researchers prepare to investigate a submerged object in the lagoon of Nikumaroro Island, believed to be the wreckage of her Lockheed Electra 10E. The discovery could finally solve the mystery surrounding Earhart’s disappearance in 1937.

The Taraia Object is a visual anomaly spotted in satellite images in 2020 and confirmed in aerial photos from 1938. Located in a lagoon on Nikumaroro Island, the object resembles parts of an aircraft and may be Earhart’s lost plane.

Expedition Details

Led by Purdue University and the Archaeological Legacy Institute, the expedition will:

• Sail 1,200 nautical miles from Majuro to Nikumaroro

• Use sonar and magnetometers to scan the site

• Dredge and lift the object for identification

• Document the process with video and photography

The team hopes to confirm the object’s identity and potentially recover the aircraft.

Amelia Earhart worked at Purdue University and received funding for her aircraft from the university’s aeronautical research program. If the plane is recovered, Purdue plans to bring it back to Indiana as part of Earhart’s legacy.

While some experts are optimistic, others remain skeptical. Previous searches yielded no results, but researchers believe recent environmental changes may have revealed the wreckage.

Earhart’s disappearance has fascinated the world for nearly 90 years. Confirming the location of her plane would be a historic milestone in aviation and archaeology, offering closure to one of the most enduring mysteries of the 20th century.

 A massive fire erupted at a Chevron refinery in Richmond, California, on October 2, 2025, sending thick plumes of black smoke into the sky and prompting emergency evacuations. The incident has reignited concerns about industrial safety, environmental impact, and emergency preparedness in the Bay Area.

The fire broke out around 3:45 p.m. local time in one of the refinery’s processing units. Witnesses reported hearing a loud boom followed by flames shooting from the facility. Within minutes, the Richmond Fire Department and Chevron’s internal emergency teams were on site.

Emergency Response

• Over 100 firefighters were deployed to contain the blaze.

• Shelter-in-place orders were issued for nearby neighborhoods due to air quality risks.

• Hazmat teams monitored chemical exposure and potential leaks.

• No fatalities were reported, but six workers were hospitalized for smoke inhalation and minor burns.

The fire released large amounts of carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter into the atmosphere. Environmental groups have called for a full investigation into Chevron’s safety protocols and emissions control systems.

Chevron issued a brief statement saying:

“We are working closely with local authorities to contain the fire and ensure the safety of our employees and the community.” The company promised a full review and pledged transparency during the investigation.

Residents expressed frustration over recurring incidents at the refinery. Many recalled the 2012 Chevron fire, which led to lawsuits and regulatory changes. Local leaders are demanding stricter oversight and improved emergency communication.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have launched investigations. Early reports suggest the fire may have originated from a leaking hydrocarbon line, though this remains unconfirmed.

The Chevron refinery fire highlights ongoing challenges in balancing industrial operations with community safety and environmental stewardship. As investigations unfold, residents and regulators await answers—and accountability.

 An early morning explosion in the Bronx’s Mott Haven neighborhood led to a partial collapse of a NYCHA high-rise on October 1, 2025. The incident shocked residents and prompted a massive emergency response, though no injuries were reported.

The explosion originated in the boiler room chimney shaft of the Mitchel Houses at 205 Alexander Avenue. A large section of the building’s corner crumbled, leaving a gaping hole and scattering debris across the area. Witnesses described hearing a thunderous boom followed by falling bricks and smoke.

Emergency Measures

• Firefighters used drones and rescue dogs to search for trapped individuals.

• Mayor Adams called it “an all-hands-on-deck moment.”

• Gas utilities were shut off, and 40 units were evacuated.

Residents of the affected wings were relocated to nearby shelters, and inspections are underway to assess structural integrity.

Residents expressed anxiety over the safety of their homes. Officials assured the public that inspections would be thorough and that long-term solutions are being explored. The incident has reignited debates about NYCHA building conditions and oversight.

This collapse is part of a troubling pattern of infrastructure failures in the Bronx. Previous explosions in 2022 and 2023 have led to legislative changes and increased scrutiny of housing safety protocols.

The Bronx building collapse in Mott Haven underscores the urgent need for infrastructure reform and tenant protection. While the absence of injuries is a relief, the event highlights vulnerabilities in public housing systems that demand immediate attention.

 As Donald Trump continues his political career into his late 70s, questions about his cognitive health have resurfaced. Speculation around whether Donald Trump has dementia has intensified, with psychologists, media outlets, and political observers weighing in. This article explores the claims, medical evaluations, and expert opinions to clarify what is known—and what remains uncertain.

What Is Dementia?

Dementia is a clinical condition marked by progressive cognitive decline, affecting memory, language, judgment, and motor skills. It is typically diagnosed through neurological assessments and behavioral observation over time.

Expert Concerns About Trump’s Cognitive Health

Several mental health professionals have publicly expressed concern about Trump’s cognitive state:

• Dr. John Gartner, a clinical psychologist and former Johns Hopkins professor, claims Trump shows signs of “major deterioration” in language, memory, and motor coordination.

• Dr. Lance Dodes, a retired Harvard psychiatrist, described Trump’s behavior as “confusion about reality,” citing incidents where he mixed up public figures and fictional characters.

• Observations include:

  • Tangential speech and incomplete thoughts

  • Memory lapses and factual confusion

  • Changes in gait and facial expression

These experts argue that the symptoms go beyond normal aging and may indicate organic cognitive decline.

Counterpoints from Medical Evaluations

Despite these concerns, Trump’s official medical records paint a different picture:

• In April 2025, White House physician Dr. Sean Barbabella reported that Trump “exhibits excellent cognitive and physical health”.

• Trump reportedly scored 30/30 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a standard screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

These results suggest no clinical evidence of dementia, according to current medical standards.

Political and Public Reactions

The debate over Trump’s mental fitness has become a political flashpoint:

• Supporters argue that criticisms are politically motivated.

• Critics cite public speeches and interviews as evidence of decline.

• The issue has prompted discussions about the 25th Amendment, which allows for removal of a president deemed unfit to serve.

Diagnosing dementia without a formal evaluation raises ethical concerns. Most professional associations discourage remote diagnosis of public figures, emphasizing the need for direct clinical assessment.

While some psychologists believe Donald Trump shows signs of dementia, official medical evaluations contradict these claims. The debate reflects broader concerns about aging leaders, cognitive transparency, and public trust. Until more definitive medical disclosures emerge, the question remains speculative.