Fareed: This Is Not a ‘Sputnik Moment’
Insights, analysis and must reads from CNN's Fareed Zakaria and the Global Public Square team, compiled by Global Briefing editor Chris Good
Seeing this newsletter as a forward? Subscribe here.
October 29, 2021 Fareed: This Is Not a 'Sputnik Moment' Was China's recent reported test of a hypersonic missile—which Beijing insists was a spacecraft—a "Sputnik moment," as some have said? The Uncertain Future of Facebook After the recent series of leaks, congressional hearings, and renewed criticism of Facebook, a Financial Times essay by Hannah Murphy, Dave Lee, and Madhumita Murgia encapsulates an uncertain moment for the company. Is Erdoğan Looking For a Distraction? What was behind President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's recent comment that Turkey would expel ambassadors from the US and other Western countries? At The New Statesman, Megan Gibson writes that while it was ostensibly offered as a response to their joint call for the release of an imprisoned businessman, Erdoğan is likely repeating an established autocratic set piece, picking a foreign fight to distract from troubles at home. Notably, the Turkish lira has fluctuated and recently hit an all-time low, as Turkey's central bank slashes interest rates and struggles with inflation. Scandinavia Isn't the Socialist Paradise Some Think It Is Scandinavian countries are often held up as examples that socialism—including heavily regulated economies and generous safety nets—can work. But at Foreign Policy, Nima Sanandaji says the region's governing ethos is misperceived: Broadly speaking, Scandinavian welfare states came into being circa 1970, but in more recent decades, top tax rates have been lowered and the weight of the state on the economy has been lifted. Having liberalized since socialist heydays, Scandinavian economies have found more economic success with toned-down approaches to taxes and regulation, Sanandaji writes. Study: Yes, Lockdowns Led to Repression As Covid-19 necessitated heavy-handed responses, commentators worried that governments around the world would seize the moment to clamp down on freedoms—unraveling democracy and suppressing dissent, not just restricting restaurant capacities.
Those fears were well founded, according to a paper in the current issue of the MIT journal International Security by Donald Grasse, Melissa Pavlik, Hilary Matfess, and Travis B. Curtice. Examining a database of instances of state repression across Africa—with those defined as incidents of state violence against people who weren't participating in any mass demonstration or riot—the authors find that such instances spiked once lockdowns were implemented in various countries, even more so in areas supportive of a country's political opposition.
Notably, some of those instances could include violent lockdown enforcements; the authors note anecdotes of police beatings of curfew violators, for example. The authors do "not argue that states always enact lockdown measures with the intention of repressing civilians"; rather, their theory is that governments use shocks like the pandemic to clamp down "opportunistically." FAREED'S GLOBAL BRIEFING You are receiving this newsletter because you're subscribed to Fareed's Global Briefing.
What did you like about today's Global Briefing? What did we miss? Let us know what you think: GlobalBriefing@cnn.com
No longer want to receive this newsletter? Unsubscribe. Interested in more? See all of our newsletters.
Create CNN Account | Listen to CNN Audio | Download the CNN App
® © 2021 Cable News Network, Inc. A WarnerMedia Company. All Rights Reserved. One CNN Center Atlanta, GA 30303
|