The Morning: Making sense of Covid changes

New C.D.C. rules and rising case numbers.

December 30, 2021

Good morning. If you're confused by changing Covid rules, you're not alone.

Receiving a rapid test this week in Washington.Kenny Holston for The New York Times

Changes and confusion

As we approach the third year of the pandemic, the coronavirus continues to make life difficult — and confusing. Official guidance on masks, testing and isolation change as new variants emerge, and a stream of case numbers turns us into armchair epidemiologists, trying to figure out how risky it is to attend a New Year's Eve party.

If the past few weeks have left you dizzy, you're not alone. In today's newsletter we'll explain some recent developments and take stock as we head into 2022.

New isolation rules

The C.D.C. this week shortened its recommended isolation period, saying that people who are infected can re-enter society after five days if they don't have symptoms or if their symptoms are resolving. The guidance adds that people should wear a mask for five days after that.

The change came about, officials said, because studies have found that a majority of transmission happens in the first five days of an infection. It also allows companies to bring back workers in half the time.

Delta Air Lines, which had urged the C.D.C. to adopt the change, welcomed the news, as did officials in the food and retail industries. In New York City, a vital subway line shut down yesterday because so many workers were out sick. Shops and restaurants have temporarily closed across Europe.

Dr. Ashish Jha called the new guidance "reasonable," as long as people follow the rule that they leave isolation only if they are asymptomatic. But Jha added that he would have required a negative rapid test before leaving isolation.

Many public health experts had a harsher reaction to the new rules, particularly the decision to omit testing. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan, called it "reckless and, frankly, stupid."

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the C.D.C. director, told CNN that the guidance "had a lot to do with what we thought people would be able to tolerate." She estimated that less than a third of people who should have isolated in the past had done so; the new rules, she said, were meant to encourage people to stay in when they were "maximally infectious."

Experts also noted that the guidelines make no distinction between vaccinated and unvaccinated people who test positive, despite the unvaccinated facing far greater risks.

"The C.D.C. should develop further guidelines, right now, that allow for those who are vaccinated and boostered to leave isolation as soon as possible after they have gotten negative results repeatedly with antigen tests," Dr. Aaron E. Carroll, the chief health officer for Indiana University, wrote in The Times. And, he added, the Biden administration should do "everything possible to make such antigen tests freely and easily available."

Severe cases

It's too early to be sure of Omicron's effect on hospitalizations and deaths. But health officials say the early data offers some cautiously positive signs.

Walensky said yesterday that cases had increased by around 60 percent over the past week and hospitalizations had risen by 14 percent. While hospitalizations tend to lag cases, she noted, the pattern is similar to countries that have had the variant for longer, like South Africa and Britain.

Take the two states below as an example. New York has been one of the hardest-hit states in the current wave, and Florida was hit hard this summer by Delta. In each, hospitalizations haven't yet reached the levels of last winter's peaks, despite cases rising past that mark. (Look up your state here.)

Source: New York Times database

"The pattern and disparity between cases and hospitalizations strongly suggest that there will be a lower hospitalization-to-case ratio when the situation becomes more clear," Dr. Anthony Fauci said yesterday.

It's not clear that Omicron's severity is the main cause of the split between cases and hospitalizations, though, as a year's worth of vaccinations and infections have strengthened the country's resistance to the virus.

Omicron and Delta

Over the past few weeks, we've been talking a lot about Omicron, which is the dominant variant in the U.S. and many other countries. But Delta, the variant that came to prominence in the summer, is still here.

South African scientists are hoping that there's some good news: People who have recovered from an infection with Omicron may be able to fend off Delta, according to a small early study. (The reverse is most likely not true: Delta antibodies seem to offer little protection against Omicron.)

If the theory holds, Omicron may eventually overwhelm Delta, Carl Zimmer explained in The Times. And if Omicron is indeed less severe, its takeover could mean that fewer people get seriously ill or die.

But that doesn't mean that Omicron will be the only variant for years to come, Carl wrote: "Once people gain immunity to Omicron, natural selection may favor mutations that produce a new variant that can evade that immunity."

Something else to know about Omicron versus earlier variants: The incubation period seems to be shorter. It may take three days for people to develop symptoms, become contagious and test positive, compared with four to six days with Delta.

New Year's Eve

All of this could have you asking whether to gather with friends or family members for New Year's Eve tomorrow. Many public health experts agree that you can celebrate with your favorite people as long as you're taking precautions.

To help you make a decision and gauge the level of risk, The Times has this quiz.

More on the virus:

THE LATEST NEWS

Politics
Voters in Detroit in 2020.Brittany Greeson for The New York Times
  • A ballot initiative in Michigan took redistricting out of the hands of partisan legislators. The result: a fairer political map.
  • The Pentagon is building a secret courtroom for war crimes trials at Guantánamo Bay.
Other Big Stories
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwellvia Reuters
Opinions

In 2008, Linda Greenhouse wrote that the Supreme Court was "in Americans' collective hands. We shape it; it reflects us." She no longer believes that.

Are the thousands of flight cancellations a blunder by the airlines or the consequence of Omicron? Peter Coy says it's a bit of both.

Subscribers enjoy more.

Stay fully informed with unlimited access to every article. Subscribe to The Times today.

MORNING READS

John Madden in a game from the 1990s.Electronic Arts

John Madden: The Hall of Famer's greatest legacy could be his video game series.

Privacy: Your DNA test could send a relative to jail.

Weed entrepreneurs: How Oklahoma became a marijuana boom state.

Mars journeys: The year in space.

Step inside: A poet and playwright's deliriously embellished house in Harlem.

Lives Lived: Lee Kaufman and her husband, Morty, found fame in their 90s when Swiffer featured them in advertising spots. "I didn't understand why people would be looking at me," she said in 2014. Kaufman died at 99.

ARTS AND IDEAS

Life beyond TikTok

This was the year TikTok's biggest stars — Charli D'Amelio, Addison Rae, Chase Hudson and others — made their jump to more traditional channels like reality TV, music, movies and memoirs.

There was the D'Amelio family's Hulu docuseries, Rae's role in the Netflix teen rom-com "He's All That," and Hudson's mall-goth-inspired debut album. Most of TikTok's most popular names are still experimenting with what a more sustainable career might look like and how to create outside the app. (And not all of their efforts have stuck — Rae has yet to release another single since her anthemic pop song, "Obsessed.")

"Throughout many of these projects, what you sense is the offscreen number-crunchers hoping to hang potential franchises on the heads and necks of these young people, who are less fully formed creative thinkers than fan-aggregation platforms in desperate need of content," Jon Caramanica writes in The Times. Read his piece on the future of TikTok stardom. — Sanam Yar, a Morning writer

PLAY, WATCH, EAT

What to Cook
David Malosh for The New York Times

Wine-braised chicken with mushrooms and leeks works well for a festive dinner.

What to Read

The critic Molly Young read the Stoics looking for instruction in a time of fear. "It was Seneca," she writes, "who vibrated my heartstrings."

What to Watch

Is there such a thing as a women's film or women's filmmaking? With "The Lost Daughter," Maggie Gyllenhaal says the answer is yes.

Now Time to Play

The pangram from yesterday's Spelling Bee was mailbox. Here is today's puzzle — or you can play online.

Here's today's Mini Crossword, and a clue: Airport arrival (five letters).

If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow.

P.S. The word "permacold" appeared recently for the first time in The Times, in an article about how scientists simulate the conditions of other planets.

"The Daily" looks back at a nursing home's first day out of lockdown.

Matthew Cullen, German Lopez, Ashley Wu and Sanam Yar contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Morning newsletter from The New York Times, or as part of your New York Times account.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018