The Morning: Putin’s new problems

His Donbas strategy isn't going well, either.

Good morning. We offer an update on the second phase of the war in Ukraine.

Ukrainian troops in the frontline town of Barinkove.Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

Putin's new problems

The first phase of the war in Ukraine was largely a failure for Russia. The second phase is not going very well so far either.

After failing to capture Kyiv and oust Ukraine's government, Vladimir Putin and his advisers turned to a less ambitious goal. They are trying to capture the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine. Russian troops do control large parts of Donbas and have made some recent progress. But it has been modest, and Ukraine has also retaken some strategically important territory.

"Russia's Donbas offensive has certainly not been as dramatic in terms of gains as we thought it might be," Michael Schwirtz, a Times correspondent who has been covering the war from the front lines in Ukraine, told me.

Today's newsletter reviews the evidence of Russia's recent failures and explains why Russian forces could nonetheless make more progress in coming weeks. Before doing so, I want to spend a moment on basic geography, which I find helpful to making sense of the war.

Putin is trying to dominate a crescent of land that stretches from the easternmost part of Ukraine, on the Russian border, to the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014. Much of the eastern section is known as the Donbas region and includes two provinces (or oblasts), Donetsk and Luhansk. If you can remember the information in this one paragraph, you'll have an easier time following analysis of the war.

By The New York Times

'Limited at best'

Here's a partial rundown of Russia's struggles:

  • Russian troops have not taken control of any major cities in the Donbas region that they did not already control in February, at the start of the invasion, my colleague Julian Barnes notes. "Russian morale remains bad," Julian says. "The casualties are bad."
  • British officials made a stunning announcement yesterday: Russia appears to have lost about one-third of the troops it has sent to Ukraine. The officials also said Russia's Donbas push had "lost momentum and fallen significantly behind schedule."
  • One recent battle was so deadly for Russia that it has led to criticism from pro-Russia bloggers.
  • "The Russian military has not yet achieved Putin's stated territorial objectives of securing all of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts and is unlikely to do so," Katherine Lawlor and Mason Clark of the Institute for the Study of War in Washington wrote on Friday. Yaroslav Trofimov of The Wall Street Journal has made similar points.
  • My colleague Michael Schwirtz noted that, until two weeks ago, he had not seen an aircraft in the sky for more than a month. But he has since seen several fighter planes and attack helicopters, all evidently Ukrainian. Russia's inability to control the air is hampering its ability to advance.
  • Avril Haines, the U.S. director of intelligence, told Congress last week that Russia was "increasingly unlikely" to meet its territorial goals in the coming weeks.

Putin's edge

In the first phase of the war, Russian troops spread themselves too thinly across Ukraine as they tried to capture much of the country. Russian supply lines often could not keep up with their fighting units, and Ukraine's military took advantage, surprising much of the world by repelling Russia's advance.

"The Russians have since changed strategy," Julian said. "They are moving much slower."

Russia is effectively trying to win a war of attrition, gaining a small amount of territory each week and ultimately controlling all of the east. Putin could then try to reach a negotiated settlement that allows him to annex parts of eastern Ukraine. Many Ukrainians, as well as their staunchest allies in the West, fear that the U.S. and E.U. might accept such a settlement.

Putin's biggest advantage remains his edge in resources: Russia has more soldiers and more military equipment than Ukraine. The West has narrowed this advantage by sending weapons to Ukraine, but Russia has destroyed some of that equipment in the fighting. One example: Some analysts believe Ukraine may be running low on Turkish-made drones that have been effective in attacking Russian troops.

That's why Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, continues to plead with the West for more weapons. President Biden and leaders of both parties in Congress support a $40 billion package that the House has passed and the Senate seems likely to pass soon. Much of Europe has also aligned itself strongly with Ukraine; Sweden and Finland have moved in recent days to join NATO.

Still, Putin's new go-slow strategy could succeed, especially if the West ultimately tires of helping Ukraine. In the U.S., many Trump-friendly Republicans are already skeptical of the war: Tucker Carlson makes this case on his Fox News show, and 57 House Republicans voted against the $40 billion aid package.

On the other hand, Russia faces its own domestic challenges: Sanctions are damaging its economy, and the industrial sector — which cannot easily import parts — is struggling to make enough precision weapons, Julian said.

Russia is also running low on troops who are available to fight. Putin could increase these numbers by instituting a draft. But doing so would require him to acknowledge that the war in Ukraine is, in fact, a war rather than the modest operation he has portrayed it as — probably because he knows public support is soft.

"As it stands, Russian options are shrinking," Michael Kofman of CNA, a Washington research group, wrote recently. "The more they drag their feet, the further their ability to sustain the war deteriorates, and the worse their subsequent options."

For now, Lt. Gen. Scott Berrier, a top U.S. intelligence official, told Congress, "the Russians aren't winning, and the Ukrainians aren't winning."

Related: Even if Russia continues to struggle, the West's endgame is not so simple, Ross Douthat of Times Opinion explains.

THE LATEST NEWS

Buffalo Shooting
A memorial outside the Tops Market in Buffalo on Sunday.Joshua Rashaad McFadden for The New York Times
  • The Buffalo supermarket shooting suspect had a history of violent threats, and received a mental health evaluation last year.
  • Officials released the full list of victims. Celestine Chaney, 65, had gone to the store with her sister to get strawberries for shortcakes.
  • Some right-wing politicians have helped promote "replacement theory," the racist ideology espoused by the gunman.
Other Big Stories
  • John Fetterman, a leading Democratic candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania, had a stroke and is recovering. The primary election is tomorrow.
  • A gunman killed one person and wounded four others at a Southern California church, before congregants overpowered him and tied him up.
  • Australia's Covid death rate is one-tenth that of the U.S. High levels of trust, in both the government and fellow citizens, are a reason for that success.
  • Two elimination games in the N.B.A. playoffs: The Boston Celtics beat the Milwaukee Bucks, last year's champions. And the Dallas Mavericks upset the Phoenix Suns.
Opinions

The next generation of vaccines must block not just severe Covid but also infections, to keep the virus from disrupting life, Akiko Iwasaki writes.

To help the environment, rewild your yard, says Margaret Renkl.

Gail Collins and Bret Stephens discuss gun control and conspiracies.

Deeply reported journalism needs your support.

The Times relies on subscribers to help fund our mission. Subscribe now with this special offer.

MORNING READS

Sister Monica Clare of the Community of St. John Baptist in New Jersey.Daniel Dorsa for The New York Times

#ConventLife: Nuns are joining TikTok. "We're not all grim old ladies reading the Bible."

Quiz time: The average score on our latest news quiz was 9.4. Can you beat it?

A Times classic: The reality behind "Below Deck."

Advice from Wirecutter: Keep your smartphone data secure.

Metropolitan Diary: Mom's last wish: Sprinkle my ashes on Fifth Avenue.

Lives Lived: Katsumoto Saotome lived through the American firebombing of Tokyo during World War II, and worked to preserve the memories of other survivors. He died at 90.

ARTS AND IDEAS

Nimarta Narang left Los Angeles for New York City.Kholood Eid for The New York Times

Who needs savings?

Many adults under 35 are throwing financial caution to the wind, Anna P. Kambhampaty reports in The Times. Discouraged about the future — given climate change, Covid, war and more — this group is saving less and pursuing passion projects or risky careers.

There are some historical analogies here. During the Cold War, the threat of nuclear war shaped young people's plans. And during the 2008 financial crisis, saving for a home felt useless for many people. "If you have an apocalyptic vision of the future, why would you save for it?" a financial psychologist said.

Hannah Jones, a standup comic in Denver, put it this way: "I'm not going to deprive myself some of the comforts of life now for a future that feels like it could be ripped away from me at any moment."

PLAY, WATCH, EAT

What to Cook
Christopher Simpson for The New York Times. Food Stylist: Simon Andrews.

Crispy grains and halloumi are a delicious vegetarian sheet-pan meal.

World Through a Lens

Get an intimate look at Mexico's Indigenous Seri people in this photo essay.

What to Read

"Chums" depicts Boris Johnson and other future politicians when they were misbehaving Oxford students, plotting their rise to power.

Now Time to Play

The pangram from yesterday's Spelling Bee was meditative. Here is today's puzzle — or you can play online.

Here's today's Wordle. Here's today's Mini Crossword and a clue: Guitar hookup (three letters).

If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David

P.S. The Pentagon's press secretary praised a Pulitzer-winning Times investigation into U.S. airstrikes, saying a free press should hold the government to account.

"The Daily" is about the racist theory fueling mass shootings.

Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti, Ashley Wu and Sanam Yar contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Morning newsletter from The New York Times, or as part of your New York Times account.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018