The Morning: Unconventional results

How the election differed from what we've come to expect in midterms.
Author Headshot

By Nate Cohn

Chief political analyst

Good morning. In states where abortion rights or democracy was on the ballot, Democrats upended the typical midterm result.

A rally in Pennsylvania before the election.Kriston Jae Bethel for The New York Times

Direct representation

The results of this year's midterm elections won't be final for weeks, but there's more than enough data to say this: They were different.

Historically, the president's party gets trounced in midterm elections. But for the first time in the era of modern polling, dating to the 1930s, the party of a president with an approval rating below 50 percent (President Biden's is in the low 40s) seems to have fared well. Democrats are favored to retain control of the Senate; they could even still hold on to the House.

Results by state only add to the unusual picture. In our era of increasingly nationalized elections, we've come to expect that trends in one part of the country will play out in others as well. Instead, this year we saw a split: Republicans fared exceptionally well in some states, including Florida and New York. In others, like Michigan and Pennsylvania, Democrats excelled.

How can we make sense of it all? The results seem to be about a pair of issues at the forefront of politics now: democracy and abortion.

Most national polls — including The Times's — suggested that these issues had faded in salience for most voters. But the two matters were at stake in direct ways in some states, whether through referendums on abortion rights or candidates on the ballot who had taken antidemocratic stances. In many of those places, Democrats defied political gravity. In states where democracy and abortion were less directly at issue, the typical midterm dynamics often took hold and Republicans excelled.

Border battle

A comparison between New York and Pennsylvania is an illustrative example. The states border each other: If you drive across the state line, things look about the same. Yet their election results look like different universes.

Democrats excelled in Pennsylvania. They ran as well as Biden had in 2020 or even better. They swept every contested House seat. John Fetterman won the race for U.S. Senate by a much wider margin than Biden had won the state. Josh Shapiro, the Democratic nominee for governor, won in a landslide.

On the other side of the state line, in New York, Republicans won big. Their candidates for Congress fared seven to 13 points better than Donald Trump had in 2020 presidential votes in those same districts. Republicans won all but one of the state's competitive congressional districts. The governor's race was fairly close in the normally blue state, though the Democratic incumbent, Kathy Hochul, held off her Republican challenger, Lee Zeldin.

Before the election, it was hard to imagine that these two outcomes could occur on the same night. In recent years, voting trends have been nationwide. Not this time.

The most obvious difference was the implications for abortion and democracy. Pennsylvania Republicans nominated a candidate for governor, Doug Mastriano, who was central to efforts to overturn the state's 2020 presidential election results. Democrats viewed a potential Mastriano victory as a threat to democracy. It might have put abortion rights at risk as well: Mastriano is a strident opponent, and Republicans controlled the state legislature, though Democrats are on track to flip it.

The two issues were less critical in New York. Its Democratic Legislature would not overturn abortion rights. No movement ever emerged to overturn Biden's 2020 victory in New York, and there was little indication that anyone feared Zeldin might do so, though he did vote as a congressman to try to overturn the 2020 results. This year, Republicans focused their campaigns on crime — an issue that worked to their advantage. It paid off.

Voting in Arlington, Va.Doug Mills/The New York Times

The bigger picture

New York and Pennsylvania are examples of the broader pattern that played out across the country, where voters who were weighing in directly on abortion or democracy helped propel Democrats to victory.

There are exceptions, of course — like Democratic strength in Colorado or Republican durability in Texas. But the pattern explains a lot of the results that upended recent election trends. It even helps explain outliers in particular states. Representative Marcy Kaptur trounced her Republican opponent, J.R. Majewski, who rallied at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, by 13 points in an Ohio district that Trump won in 2020. All but one of the other Republicans in House races in Ohio performed better than Trump had.

One example that might help put the midterm trends into context is Virginia. It had no statewide races because it held its governor's race last year and had no Senate seat up for election in 2022. As a result, the unusual state-by-state dynamics were absent, so Virginia acts something like a control.

Republicans there tended to fare well. They outperformed Trump in every House race, some by double-digit margins. If abortion and democracy hadn't been major issues elsewhere, perhaps Virginia's seemingly typical show of out-of-party strength would have been the result nationwide. But not this year.

More on the elections

THE LATEST NEWS

Economy
  • Consumer prices rose 7.7 percent in the year through October. The pace was slower than economists anticipated, and below 8 percent for the first time since February.
  • The cost of housing and groceries continued to rise. Airline fares and used vehicles were cheaper than the month before.
  • The cooler inflation gave investors hope that the Federal Reserve may temper rate increases. The S&P 500 rose 5.5 percent, its best day since April 2020.
War in Ukraine
Politics
Other Big Stories
Opinions

It's time for the U.S. to support paying the countries that climate change hurts most, Ani Dasgupta says.

Myanmar is in chaos. The world seems to barely notice, Nilar Thein writes.

MORNING READS

Sylvester Stallone plays a crime boss in "Tulsa King," his first major TV role.Sinna Nasseri for The New York Times

"Tulsa King": Sylvester Stallone is trying something new — being himself.

Modern Love: Failing in marriage does not mean failing at marriage.

A Times classic: How "WAP" took over TikTok.

A morning listen: "Hard Fork" tackles tech's tumultuous week.

Lives Lived: Gal Costa was a leader of tropicĂ¡lia, the 1960s movement that brought psychedelic experimentation and irreverence to Brazilian pop music. Her career spanned more than 50 years and three dozen albums. She died at 77.

SPORTS NEWS FROM THE ATHLETIC

LeBron James weighs in: The Lakers star said that the Nets guard Kyrie Irving should be allowed to return to the court after apologizing for promoting an antisemitic film, but James said that what Irving posted "caused some harm."

Meet the Cavinder twins: Haley and Hanna Cavinder are good at playing basketball as well as at being Cavinder Inc., which has led to millions of followers and nearly $2 million in revenue.

Panthers top Falcons: Carolina moved to 3-7 with a 25-15 win over Atlanta last night, throwing the N.F.C. South into more chaos. Every team in the division is below .500 this year.

ARTS AND IDEAS

The return of 'The Crown'

"The Crown" has returned to Netflix, its new season depicting the British royals in the 1990s. It was an uncertain time for the monarchy, The Times's Sarah Lyall writes. Britain had entered a recession. Infidelity doomed royal relationships (Prince Charles's and Diana's included). And Queen Elizabeth II, in her 60s, was not yet widely beloved.

The show has cast new stars in its central roles: Elizabeth Debicki and Dominic West play Diana and Charles, and the acclaimed stage actress Imelda Staunton portrays the queen.

Review: "The show seems more fantastical even as it moves firmly into living memory," the Times critic Mike Hale writes.

Subscribe to New York Times Cooking for 50% off your first year. Discover a variety of recipes for Thanksgiving — and every day.

PLAY, WATCH, EAT

What to Cook

This is the Roman pasta dish cacio e pepe, but in pizza form.

What to Read

The trash-talking detective in "Viviana Valentine Gets Her Man," Emily Edwards' debut, is a throwback to characters from the past.

What to Watch

Lindsay Lohan plays an heiress who loses her memory in "Falling for Christmas." "I'd rather have amnesia," the critic Calum Marsh writes.

Late Night

The hosts discussed Twitter, the Republican Party's new treatment of Trump and more.

News Quiz
Now Time to Play

The pangrams from yesterday's Spelling Bee were hauling and laughing. Here is today's puzzle.

Here's today's Mini Crossword, and a clue: Chicken ___ king (three letters).

And here's today's Wordle. After, use our bot to get better.

Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow.

P.S. After 34 years, The Times will no longer refer to Luiz InĂ¡cio Lula da Silva, Brazil's president-elect, as "Mr. da Silva" on second reference, but as "Mr. Lula."

There's no new episode of "The Daily." "Popcast" is about Stevie Wonder.

Matthew Cullen, Lauren Hard, Lauren Jackson, Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti and Ashley Wu contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Morning newsletter from The New York Times, or as part of your New York Times account.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018