The Morning: Turning sci-fi into reality

Scientists announced a nuclear fusion breakthrough.

Good morning. After decades of research, scientists have reached an important milestone in the future of energy.

Inspecting a final optics assembly at the National Ignition Facility in California.Jason Laurea/Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Star power

If you enjoy science fiction, you might have heard of nuclear fusion. In the real world, fusion is what powers the sun. In some sci-fi tales, humans in a far-flung future have learned how to wield fusion for an end-all, be-all source of energy — one that is abundant and does not pollute the environment or release dangerous levels of radioactive waste.

Yesterday, scientists at the Department of Energy announced a breakthrough that could help make that sci-fi vision into reality. After decades of trying, scientists for the first time carried out a nuclear fusion reaction that produced more energy than went into it. Behind that technical description is a simple but important breakthrough: Humans can tap into the process that powers stars to produce energy on Earth.

"It's a true scientific moment," my colleague Kenneth Chang, who covers physics and other sciences, told me. "It lets you look forward and get hopeful about what's possible."

Why is this result such a big deal? As a clean source of energy, nuclear fusion could help replace polluting fossil fuels and overcome climate change. And if the remaining challenges — of which there are many — are figured out, nuclear fusion could produce more energy than today's technologies are capable of.

Serious barriers remain before that potential future, experts caution. Can scientists reliably replicate what they've done only once? Can it be done more efficiently and more quickly? Can it be scaled up? All these questions are serious enough that, if not overcome, yesterday's announcement may ultimately amount to little.

Anything involving nuclear science can get technical and complicated fast. In today's newsletter, I want to walk you through some of the basics so you can understand why the announcement could be a big discovery.

Imitating the sun

Fusion is what powers the sun and other stars. The sun's massive gravitational pull constantly compresses hydrogen atoms and fuses them into helium, releasing bursts of energy. That energy is transmitted across the solar system as light and heat, in rare circumstances creating the conditions for life.

Back on Earth, scientists hope to replicate a tiny fraction of that process to power our other technologies and infrastructure, without emitting the climate-warming emissions that coal, oil and gas do or the radioactive waste that current nuclear power plants do.

Most nuclear fusion experiments have used doughnut-shaped reactors and magnetic fields to trap hydrogen, fuse it and release energy. Those experiments have not yet produced more energy than they used — the goal they need to meet to be considered a true source of energy.

What the Department of Energy's lab did was different. It fired 192 lasers at a tiny hydrogen pellet. This heated up the pellet, causing it to implode, fuse into helium and release a blast of energy.

The lab had been conducting this experiment for years, tweaking how and where the lasers are fired. On Dec. 5, the changes paid off: The resulting nuclear fusion produced more energy — about 50 percent more — than the incoming energy from the lasers. (Although firing the lasers uses more energy — a different problem to solve.)

"They can say unequivocally that they did a nuclear fusion reaction that produces more energy than goes in to start the reaction," Kenneth said. "Nuclear fusion research has been around for 50 years, and no one has been able to say that before."

The goal now is to refine this approach further, hopefully to make it commercially viable and eventually to supplant other, dirtier sources of energy.

Remaining barriers

As exciting as the results are to scientists, they acknowledged that potentially decades of work remain before this breakthrough leads to widespread commercial use, if it ever does.

For one, scientists have achieved this kind of fusion reaction exactly once. Commercial use would require facilities to reproduce that result reliably and constantly, firing lasers up to 10 times a second.

Some of the fuel used for this particular process could also be hard to come by. Other possible fuels exist — potentially from mining the moon (yes, that's as wild as it sounds) — but those would require a whole different set of breakthroughs to obtain and use.

And there are more practical questions about cost and scale. The Department of Energy's laser complex takes up the equivalent of three football fields, Kenneth noted — "too big, too expensive, too inefficient for a commercial power plant."

Yet it's typical for scientific breakthroughs to start in unrealistic lab settings before they are refined for public use. At the very least, this discovery shows that nuclear fusion can be a source of energy. Now the work begins to try to turn that into a usable technology.

For more

ADVERTISEMENT

THE LATEST NEWS

Business
Sam Bankman-Fried leaving court in the Bahamas yesterday.Dante Carrer/Reuters
Politics
President Biden outside the White House yesterday.Oliver Contreras for The New York Times
War in Ukraine
Other Big Stories
Opinions

Abandoning "zero Covid" is a chance for Xi Jinping to pivot away from the perils of one-man rule, Minxin Pei says.

On the final episode of "The Argument," Justin Amash and Jane Coaston talk about when your political party leaves you behind.

Discover all of The Times — news and analysis, plus recipes, games, product reviews and personalized sports journalism — with the New York Times All Access subscription. Experience it all at this special rate.

MORNING READS

Hyosun Hwang

Top drawings: "How to feel better naked" and The Times's other best illustrations of the year.

Combustible materials: This pottery gets its color by chance.

To-do lists: Save yourself from "task paralysis."

Lives Lived: Lloyd Newman teamed up with a fellow teenager in the 1990s to record two award-winning radio documentaries about growing up in a Chicago public housing project. He died at 43.

SPORTS NEWS FROM THE ATHLETIC

Mike Leach dies at 61: The beloved coach at Mississippi State died this week after complications from a heart condition. Read about his enduring influence on the game in his obituary.

A megadeal: The shortstop Carlos Correa agreed to sign with the San Francisco Giants on a 13-year, $350 million contract.

ADVERTISEMENT

WORLD CUP

One game away: Argentina beat Croatia, 3-0, to reach the final, putting Lionel Messi on the cusp of his first World Cup title.

Today: France and Morocco face each other in the next semifinal at 2 p.m. Eastern. The face-off is reviving old colonial wounds.

Anxiety: Morocco's magical run has elated fans, but for some, the strain of the impending showdown is too much.

ARTS AND IDEAS

Le Rock in Rockefeller Center.Karsten Moran for The New York Times

A delicious 2022

This was a year of restaurant openings in New York, reaching "an almost frantic, Lucy-in-the-chocolate-factory speed in the past few weeks," the Times critic Pete Wells writes. And while the economy did create some challenges for restaurants this year, including a labor shortage that prompted earlier closing times and shorter weeks, a lot of the city's new establishments were well equipped to handle it.

Among the new restaurants, Pete picked 10 that stand out. They include a cafe in Midtown that feels like it's in Milan, the city's best Thai food, and a superb omakase sushi meal.

Affordable dining: If you're looking for a meal that's more in the $10 range, here are places in New York where you can get great food for reasonable prices.

PLAY, WATCH, EAT

What to Cook
Joel Goldberg for The New York Times

This recipe is for a classic, unadorned latke.

Wirecutter Gift Guide

Gift recommendations under $100, $50 and $10.

What to Read

In the novel "The Tatami Galaxy," a college junior has four chances at happiness, with frustratingly similar results.

Late Night

Stephen Colbert joked about Republicans' texting habits.

Now Time to Play

The pangrams from yesterday's Spelling Bee were blockable, cookable and lockable. Here is today's puzzle.

Here's today's Mini Crossword, and a clue: $100, in slang (five letters).

And here's today's Wordle.

Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — German

P.S. The League of Nations, a forerunner to the U.N., expelled the Soviet Union 83 years ago today for invading Finland.

"The Daily" is about abortion.

Matthew Cullen, Lauren Hard, Lauren Jackson, Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti and Ashley Wu contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Morning newsletter from The New York Times, or as part of your New York Times account.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018