Good morning. The Manhattan indictments may not even present the biggest legal threat to Donald Trump. |
 | | Donald Trump arriving at Trump Tower yesterday.Dave Sanders for The New York Times |
|
I also want to devote part of today's newsletter to the other three criminal investigations of Trump — because at least one of them could end up being more significant than the charges in Manhattan, both legally and politically. |
For one thing, some legal experts view the Manhattan case skeptically. The closest analogy to it may be the 2012 trial of John Edwards, the former Democratic presidential candidate, who was accused of violating campaign-finance law by hiding payments to cover up an extramarital affair. Jurors acquitted Edwards of one charge and deadlocked on the others, a reminder that many people are uncomfortable criminalizing scandals that revolve around consensual sex. |
The political impact of sex scandals is similarly questionable. Trump has a long, public history of cheating on his wives, as any reader of New York's tabloid newspapers knows. It did not keep him from being elected president any more than Bill Clinton's reputation for infidelity kept him from winning in 1992. Clinton also lied about an affair while he was president — under oath, no less — but many Americans nonetheless believed he should remain in the job. |
The case against Trump could turn out differently, of course: He could be convicted. Even if he is, though, the charges do not seem likely to change many voters' views of Trump. |
Two of the other three investigations into Trump are somewhat different. They are about democracy, not sex, and there is already reason to believe that they are more politically threatening to him. |
One of the two is a federal investigation into Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. The second involves those same efforts, but only in Georgia, where local prosecutors are looking into his failed attempt to overturn the result. Prosecutors have not yet announced whether they will bring charges in either case. |
Both stem from Trump's rejection of basic democratic principles that other leaders of both parties have long accepted — that the loser of an election should concede; that politicians should not tell brazen and repeated lies; that violence is an unacceptable political tactic. Over the past few years, a small — but crucial — slice of voters who are otherwise sympathetic to the Republican Party have indicated that they are uncomfortable with Trump's attacks on democracy. |
In 2020, he became only the fourth president in the past century to lose re-election, even as Republican congressional candidates fared better than expected. Last year, Trump's preferred candidates performed about five percentage points worse than otherwise similar Republicans, my colleague Nate Cohn estimates. As a result, every election denier who ran to oversee elections in a battleground state last year lost. |
An indictment and a trial in either the Jan. 6 case or the Georgia case would again focus attention on Trump's anti-democratic behavior. Most of his supporters would probably stick by him, but the cases probably present a greater risk to his standing with swing voters than a case revolving around the cover-up of an affair. And if polls were to show Trump clearly losing a hypothetical rematch with President Biden, some Republican primary voters might become nervous, hurting Trump in the primaries. |
I'm not predicting that outcome or any other specific scenario. There is a great deal of uncertainty about Trump's legal problems and the 2024 election. I merely want to remind you that while attention will understandably focus on the Manhattan case this week, Trump's legal problems are larger than this one case. |
Here's our overview of the other three cases, compiled by my colleague Ian Prasad Philbrick. |
This is a federal investigation into Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The investigation appears to be focusing on Trump's role in the Jan. 6 attack, on attempts by him and his allies to recruit fake presidential electors in key states, and on their fund-raising off false voter-fraud claims. |
Typically, the Justice Department tries to avoid taking actions that could influence the outcome of a campaign that has formally begun. (James Comey's rejection of this tradition in the Hillary Clinton email case was a major exception.) If Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing this Trump inquiry, follows the tradition, Smith may make an announcement about whether to bring charges well before the end of this year. |
"He wants to resolve things quickly. But we cannot say how quickly," my colleague Alan Feuer, who's been covering the case, said. |
After Trump lost the 2020 election, he pressured Georgia's top elections official "to find 11,780 votes," enough to overturn his defeat. A grand jury investigating those efforts heard from 75 witnesses, including Rudy Giuliani and Lindsey Graham, and recommended that prosecutors charge multiple people with crimes. It's unclear whether Trump is among them, because much of the grand jury's report remains secret. But the jury's forewoman has hinted he was among them. |
The charges could include attempted election fraud and racketeering related to Trump's involvement in a plan to recruit fake presidential electors. Prosecutors will likely decide whether to charge anyone by next month. |
The third case — involving the handling of classified documents — is probably less threatening to Trump, at least from a political standpoint. Many politicians, apparently including Biden and former Vice President Mike Pence, have broken the rules for handling classified material. It's partly a reflection of what many experts consider the over-classification of documents, including many that contain mundane information. |
Trump's case does seem more extreme, however. He not only took hundreds of classified documents from the White House but also repeatedly resisted giving many of them back. Charges could include obstruction of justice for defying a subpoena. Smith is overseeing this inquiry as well, and the timing of a resolution remains unknown. |
 | | Clockwise from left: Christina Koch, Victor Glover, Jeremy Hansen and Reid Wiseman.Josh Valcarcel/NASA Johnson Space Center, via Reuters |
|
 | | A member of the Blackfeet Nation in Montana resting after shooting a bison last month.Michael Hanson for The New York Times |
|
Love story: She thought her crush on a colleague was secret. Until someone asked, "Why do you have Jake pinned to your screen?" |
Lives Lived: As a young man, Raghavan Iyer didn't know how to cook a simple potato curry. He went on to teach America's heartland how to prepare Indian cuisine. Iyer died at 61. |
| SPORTS NEWS FROM THE ATHLETIC |
 | | Connecticut players celebrating their win yesterday.Godofredo A. Vasquez/Associated Press |
|
N.C.A.A. men's tournament winners: The UConn Huskies claimed their fifth national title with a 76-59 drubbing of upstart San Diego State. They survived a chaotic men's tournament which saw all four No. 1 seeds lose before the Elite Eight. |
A possible invite: Jill Biden suggested that the women's runner-up, Iowa, could also be invited to the White House alongside national champion L.S.U. Tigers star Angel Reese responded with laughing emojis. |
Authors' estates have been altering the text of well-known books to remove language that some may consider offensive, raising questions about art and censorship. But for publishers, there's another important factor: making sure those books still sell. |
Agatha Christie continues to find new fans, and her estate had those readers in mind when it recently removed bigoted language from some of her novels. Christie's estate learned long ago how lucrative such a change could be: In the 1980s, it dropped the title from the U.K. edition of one novel, which contained a slur, and adopted the U.S. title, "And Then There Were None." It remains her best-selling book. |
 | | David Malosh for The New York Times |
|
The pangram from yesterday's Spelling Bee was commodity. Here is today's puzzle. |
Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David |
P.S. We have winners in The Morning's March Madness pools: "KarlyRenee" in the women's bracket, and "Archytas" in the men's. Congratulations! If you're one of them, email us at themorning@nytimes.com to receive your prize. |
"The Daily" is about Wisconsin's Supreme Court election. |
 | Editor: David Leonhardt Deputy Editor: Amy Fiscus News Editor: Tom Wright-Piersanti News Staff: Lauren Jackson, Sean Kawasaki-Culligan, Brent Lewis, German Lopez, Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Ashley Wu News Assistant: Lauren Hard Saturday Writer: Melissa Kirsch |
|
