Good morning. Are Democrats again about to be disappointed by overly optimistic polling? |
 | | A polling station in Miami Beach, Fla.Scott McIntyre for The New York Times |
|
The final polls in the 2020 presidential election overstated Joe Biden's strength, especially in a handful of states. |
The polls reported that Biden had a small lead in North Carolina, but he lost the state to Donald Trump. The polls also showed Biden running comfortably ahead in Wisconsin, yet he won it by less than a percentage point. In Ohio, the polls pointed to a tight race; instead, Trump won it easily. |
In each of these states — and some others — pollsters failed to reach a representative sample of voters. One factor seems to be that Republican voters are more skeptical of mainstream institutions and are less willing to respond to a survey. If that's true, polls will often understate Republican support, until pollsters figure out how to fix the problem. (I explained the problem in more depth in a 2020 article.) |
This possibility offers reason to wonder whether Democrats are really doing as well in the midterm elections as the conventional wisdom holds. Recent polls suggest that Democrats are favored to keep control of the Senate narrowly, while losing control of the House, also narrowly. |
But the Democrats' strength in the Senate campaign depends partly on their strength in some of the same states where polls exaggerated Democratic support two years ago, including the three that I mentioned above: North Carolina, Ohio and Wisconsin. |
Nate Cohn, The Times's chief political analyst, calls it "a warning sign" — for both the Democratic Party and for the polls. Nate goes into more depth in one of the first editions of a newsletter that he will be writing a couple of times a week for the rest of the midterm campaign. |
(If you're fascinated by politics, I encourage you to sign up. It's available to Times subscribers, and Nate is one of the sharpest political analysts working today. He helps oversee Times polls and has a record of noticing trends before many others do. One example was in June 2016, when he wrote: "There are more white voters than people think. That's good news for Trump.") |
Nate is also careful to acknowledge what he doesn't know, and he emphasizes that the polls may not be wrong this year in the same way that they were wrong in 2020. It's even possible that pollsters are understating Democratic support this year by searching too hard for Republican voters in an effort to avoid repeating recent mistakes. |
The unavoidable reality is that polling is both an art and a science, requiring hard judgments about which kinds of people are more or less likely to respond to a survey and more or less likely to vote in the fall. There are still some big mysteries about the polls' recent tendency to underestimate Republican support. |
The pattern has not been uniform across the country, for instance. In some states — such as Georgia, Nevada and Pennsylvania — the final polls have been pretty accurate lately. This inconsistency makes the problem harder to fix because pollsters can't simply boost the Republican share everywhere. |
There is also some uncertainty about whether the problem is as big when Trump is not on the ballot — and he is obviously not running for office this year. Douglas Rivers, the chief scientist of the polling firm YouGov, told me that he thought this was the case and that there is something particular about Trump that complicates polling. Similarly, Nate noted that the polls in the 2018 midterms were fairly accurate. |
Finally, as Nate points out, the 2022 campaign does have two dynamics that may make it different from a normal midterm and that may help Democrats. The Supreme Court, dominated by Republican appointees, issued an unpopular decision on abortion, and Trump, unlike most defeated presidents, continues to receive a large amount of attention. |
As a result, this year's election may feel less like a referendum on the current president and more like a choice between two parties. Biden, for his part, is making this point explicitly. "Every election's a choice," he said recently. "My dad used to say, 'Don't compare me to the Almighty, Joey. Compare me to the alternative.'" |
Just about every election cycle, there's an argument for why, this time, things might be different — different from the expectations set by historical trends and key factors like the state of the economy or the president's approval rating. The arguments are often pretty plausible. After all, every cycle is different. There's almost always something unprecedented about a given election year. There's always a way to spin up a rationale for why old rules won't apply. In the end, history usually prevails. That's a good thing to keep in mind right now as Democrats show strength that seems entirely at odds with the long history of the struggles of the president's party in midterm elections. But this cycle, there really is something different — or at the very least, there is something different about the reasons "this cycle might be different." |
 | | President Biden remembering 9/11.Al Drago for The New York Times |
|
 | | The Kharkiv region this weekend.Juan Barreto/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images |
|
- Russia acknowledged that it had lost much of Kharkiv, a military stronghold, as Ukraine's lightning advance took back more than 1,000 square miles.
- Russian cruise missiles knocked out power to regions in eastern and northeastern Ukraine in apparent retaliation.
- Ukraine drew on U.S. intelligence to plan its counterassault. The gains in the northeast have been the most important advances of the war, American officials said.
|
To soften its Senate candidates' images, the G.O.P. is turning to their wives. It's trite and insulting, Michelle Cottle writes. |
A subscription to The New York Times plays a vital role in making this in-depth reporting possible. Consider supporting us by becoming a subscriber today. |
Lives Lived: Thomas Carney tended bar at Elaine's for decades. The Times once wrote that he kept alive the traditions of saloons: "wit, tact, patience and a boundless tolerance for drunks." He died at 82. |
| SPORTS NEWS FROM THE ATHLETIC |
A new era in men's tennis: Teen phenom Carlos Alcaraz seized his first Grand Slam title in a four-set win over the Norwegian player Casper Ruud at the U.S. Open. The Spaniard's stunning tournament might even have left tennis fans feeling optimistic about the post-Big Three future. |
Panic time for the Dallas Cowboys? Quarterback Dak Prescott exited yesterday's 19-3 loss to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers with an injury to his throwing hand. He will undergo surgery and miss several weeks. Here are the other takeaways from Week 1 of the N.F.L. season. |
W.N.B.A. finals get underway: The typically high-scoring Las Vegas Aces narrowly edged the Connecticut Sun 67-64 at home in Game 1. It was the game the Sun wanted, but MVP A'ja Wilson lifted the Aces to a win. Game 2 is tomorrow at 9 p.m. Eastern. |
Tasting menus for the people |
More chefs are embracing tasting menus, while rejecting the grandiose conventions and price tags that usually accompany them, Brett Anderson writes in The Times. |
Tasting menus can be surprisingly thrifty. Because they tend to require reservations, with meals chosen in advance, chefs can purchase the precise amount of ingredients. That has allowed aspiring restaurateurs to branch off on their own, serving food to small groups without much overhead. |
At Southern Soigné in Jackson, Miss., Zacchaeus Golden offers a multicourse dinner for $95, a fraction of the cost of most lavish tasting-menu marathons. One way he keeps it affordable: The only other employee is his mother, Margie. |
 | | Rikki Snyder for The New York Times |
|
The trick to this chicken salad is the method for poaching chicken. |
 | | NYT |
|
The pangram from yesterday's Spelling Bee was devotion. Here is today's puzzle. |
Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David |
P.S. Katie Baker is joining The Times from BuzzFeed News to cover the social and cultural conflicts dividing the U.S. |
Lauren Hard, Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti and Ashley Wu contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com. |
|
